Musar for Kiddushin 116:5
דמר אית ליה דשמואל ומר לית ליה דשמואל
R'Jose son of R'Judah said: He must pay only for the hullin it contains. Surely they differ in this: one Master holds that disposal rights are money, while the other maintains that they are not? - No: all agree that disposal rights are not money, but here, however, the reference is to tebalim which he inherited from the house of his maternal grandfather, a priest, and they differ as to whether unseparated [priestly] dues are regarded as separated: one Master holds that they are regarded as separated,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence they have a monetary value to the Israelite, and so the thief must pay for them.');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Explore musar for Kiddushin 116:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.