Quoting%20commentary for Menachot 125:17

אמר לו רבי שמעון

is stated twice, in order to permit even what is baked in a stove. R'Simeon says, 'Oven' is stated twice, once to teach that it must be baked in an oven, and once that it is hallowed by the oven. But is R'Simeon of this view?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the oven hallows the offering.');">¹⁹</span> Surely we have learnt:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Infra 95b. hdtp ,hc');">²⁰</span> R'Simeon says, Accustom thyself to say, The Two Loaves and the Shewbread were valid whether made in the Temple court or in Beth Page!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' , a place outside the Temple court but within the walls of Jerusalem. V. infra 78b, P. 468, n. 6. Now if R. Simeon were of the opinion that the oven hallowed the offering, it would surely become invalid as soon as it was taken out of the Temple court! V. however, Tosaf. s.v. ,urafu , and Sh. Mek. n. 27.');">²¹</span> - Raba answered, Say rather, it should be consecrated for the oven.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., when setting aside the flour for this meal-offering one should expressly state that it is to be baked in the oven.');">²²</span> [IF HE SAID,] 'I TAKE UPON MYSELF [TO OFFER] A BAKED MEAL-OFFERING', HE MAY NOT BRING HALF IN CAKES etc. Our Rabbis taught: And when thou bringest,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. II, 4.');">¹⁷</span> that is, when thou bringest, doing so as a matter of free choice. An offering of a meal-offering:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. II, 4.');">¹⁷</span> R'Judah said, Whence do I know that if a man said, 'I take upon myself [to offer] a baked meal-offering', he may not bring half in cakes and half in wafers? Because the text states, 'An offering of a meal-offering': I spoke to thee of one offering but not of two or thr offerings. Said to him R'Simeon,

Explore quoting%20commentary for Menachot 125:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.