Quoting%20commentary for Nedarim 92:5

המודר הנאה מחבירו ויש לו שם מרחץ וכו': וכמה תפיסת יד אמר רב נחמן למחצה לשליש ולרביע אבל בבציר לא אביי אמר אפילו בבציר אסור היכי דמי דשרי דמקבל בטסקא:

but if it is, all agree that both are forbidden. R. Huna said: The <i>halachah</i> is as R. Eliezer b. Jacob; and R. Eleazar said likewise: The <i>halachah</i> is as R. Eliezer b. Jacob. IF ONE IS FORBIDDEN BY VOW TO BENEFIT FROM HIS NEIGHBOUR, AND THE LATTER POSSESSES A BATH-HOUSE etc. How much is meant by AN INTEREST THEREIN? — R. Nahman said: A half, third, or a quarter, but not less.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Less than a quarter is regarded as negligible. And the muddar is not forbidden to use it on its account. [Var. lec., 'but for eggs it is permitted'. [H] for [H], the reference being to the egg-shaped forms of clay which are placed in the oven of the bath-house for drying. If his interest consists in the use he makes of the bath-house for that purpose, it is not regarded of any consequence.] ');">⁵</span> Abaye said, Even for less, he is forbidden. Under what conditions is he permitted? If he [the lessee] rents it in return for [the payment of] the land-tax.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The tax must have been very high if the owner was prepared to forego any possible profit. — Taska was the Persian land tax. (v. Obermeyer. p. 221, n. 3), and the Mishnah, which was produced in Palestine, cannot actually refer to this tax. Abaye's interpretation must therefore be regarded merely as an illustration. [Aliter: If he (the lessee) obtained it on a rental; retaining all the profit to himself.] ');">⁶</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Nedarim 92:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.