Reference for Arakhin 27:20

אלמא קסבר רב הונא

R'Nahman raised the following objection to R'Huna: IT IS ALL ONE WHETHER A MAN DEDICATES A FIELD IN THE SANDY PLAIN OF MAHUZ OR IN THE GARDENS<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The gardens of Sebaste were planted vineyards, nevertheless the Mishnah states they can be redeemed with fifty silver pieces etc., which shows that the trees were redeemed with them, thus disproving the view of R. Huna. The latter says the sum mentioned refers only to the field; as for the trees, they must be redeemed at their value, the redemption of one following the other.');">¹⁰</span>

Explore reference for Arakhin 27:20. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.