Reference for Chullin 270:1
ורבנן לא נכתוב רחמנא לא וי"ו ולא ראשית
And the Rabbis? - [They say] the Divine Law then should have stated neither 'and' nor 'first'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If any analogy was to be inferred from the two laws, both these expressions then should have been omitted, viz., 'and' which implies connection with the preceding subject and 'first' which implies separateness.');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy