Reference for Eruvin 109:13
ומאי קמ"ל דנותנין קרפף לזו וקרפף לזו הא אמרה רב הונא חדא זימנא דתנן
while the latter deals with one that had breaches on two sides.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 6.');"><sup>35</sup></span> Then what does he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Huna in the last ruling cited.');"><sup>36</sup></span> inform us? That a karpaf<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of a length of seventy and two thirds cubits.');"><sup>37</sup></span> is allowed for each section.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the same manner as one is allowed for each of two adjacent towns which are thereby combined to form one town for the purposes of Sabbath movements.');"><sup>38</sup></span> But did not R'Huna once lay down such a ruling, as we learned: