Reference for Eruvin 113:18
לימא תיהוי תיובתיה דחייא בר רב אמר לך חייא בר רב
WAS INSTITUTED ONLY etc. It was stated: R'Huna laid down: A karpaf is allowed for each town. Hiyya B'Rab laid down: Only one karpaf is allowed for both towns. We learned: BUT THE SAGES RULED: [THE LAW OF] KARPAF WAS INSTITUTED ONLY BETWEEN TWO TOWNS. Is not this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The use of KARPAF in the sing.');"><sup>35</sup></span> an objection against R'Huna? - R'Huna can answer you: What is meant by 'KARPAF'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The use of KARPAF in the sing.');"><sup>35</sup></span> The law of karpaf, but in fact a karpaf is allowed for each town. This may also be supported by reason, since in the final clause it was stated: SO THAT BY ADDING TO EACH ONE A STRETCH OF LAND OF SEVENTY AND A FRACTION CUBITS THE KARPAF COMBINES THE TWO TOWNS INTO ONE. This is conclusive. Must it be said that this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The final clause just cited, according to which a karpaf is allowed to each town.');"><sup>36</sup></span> presents an objection against Hiyya B'Rab?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who allows only one karpaf for both towns.');"><sup>37</sup></span> - Hiyya B'Rab can answer you: