Reference for Eruvin 139:9

אי דהוה ומית אימא סיפא אבל אין אחד שעירב נותן רשותו לאחד שלא עירב ואי דהוה ומית אמאי לא

If one<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A tenant with whom an 'erub was prepared.');">²⁶</span> was there only before and is now dead why should not this be permitted?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why should not the survivor be allowed to renounce his share.');">²⁸</span> It is consequently obvious that he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A tenant with whom an 'erub was prepared.');">²⁶</span> was still there and, since the final clause is a cas where he was there, must not the first clause also deal with one who was still alive?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The objection against Rabbah thus arises again.');">²⁹</span> - What an argument! Each clause may deal with a different case.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'that as it is, and that' etc.');">³⁰</span>

Jastrow