Reference for Eruvin 160:1
שאני התם דליכא מחיצות
- The case may be different there where no partitions are in existence.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the absence of side-post or cross-beam the alley remains exposed to the public domain and all movement of objects within it is strictly forbidden. In order to liberate the residents from such serious inconvenience it may well have been ordered that they may coerce any recalcitrant neighbour. In the case of shittuf, however, the purpose of which is merely to provide the residents with the added convenience of carrying objects into the alley from their houses and courtyards, it may well be maintained that no one may be coerced to join if he refuses to do so. MS.M. and R. Tam. read: 'where there are partitions'. For the interpretation v. Tosaf. a.l.');"><sup>1</sup></span> Another reading: From the side is different.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is meaningless and is deleted by Bah. It is also wanting in MS.M. and several of the old ed. Some emendations have been suggested. Cf. Elijah Wilna glosses and Golds.');"><sup>2</sup></span> It was stated: R'Hiyya B'Ashi ruled: A side-post may be made from an Asherah, but R'Simeon B'Lakish ruled: A crossbeam may be made from an Asherah. He who permitted a crossbeam<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though its size must conform to a prescribed minimum.');"><sup>3</sup></span>