Reference for Eruvin 160:9
<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> במאי עסקינן אילימא במין אחד מאי איריא נתמעט אפילו כלה נמי
what point was there in speaking of an 'erub that WAS REDUCED seeing that the same law<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' THERE IS NO NEED TO INFORM THEM.');"><sup>27</sup></span> applies even if nothing of it remained? If the reference, however, is to two kinds,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. that the addition is made from a food that is different from the original.');"><sup>28</sup></span> the same law<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The implication (cf. supra p. 561, n. 18) that 'the residents must be informed'.');"><sup>29</sup></span>
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy