Reference for Eruvin 206:5
הכא במאי עסקינן כגון שעלתה לו נשיכה בגבו ובאצילי ידיו דאיהו לא מצי שקיל לה
that [for such acts a sin-offering is incurred but here, though the preliminary requirements of a precept supersede the Sabbath,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even where a Pentateuchal prohibition is involved; and the removal of the wen in any manner is in fact permitted.');"><sup>11</sup></span> a change must be made as far as this is possible?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence the ruling that the priest himself must not remove his wen and that his friend should do it with his teeth only, which proves does it not, that a change must be made wherever possible?');"><sup>12</sup></span> - No, it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 5.');"><sup>13</sup></span> may in fact represent the view of the Rabbis,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' While R. Eliezer requires no change whatever and permits the removal of the wen even with an instrument by the priest himself');"><sup>14</sup></span>