Reference for Gittin 33:13
ריש לקיש מ"ט לא אמר כרבי יוחנן אמר לך
Resh Lakish said: So that he should not sell the increment of his wife's property.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'on account of the usufruct'. The so-called 'property of sucking' (mulug) which was settled on the wife at the time of marriage but of which the husband was to have the usufruct so long as they were married. (V. Glos. and B.B., Sonc. ed., p. 206, n. 7). If the Get was undated, he might wrongfully assert that he had sold the increment before the divorce. ');"><sup>12</sup></span> Why did Resh Lakish not give the reason that R. Johanan gave? — He might argue
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy