Reference for Keritot 35:38
הא קמ"ל דר"מ בשיטת ר' אליעזר קאי
but rather because if you said that he was exempt, you would thereby establish a sin-offering for the first.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The exemption of the second may be taken to imply that the first definitely ate the heleb, who should therefore be liable to a sin-offering.');"><sup>17</sup></span>
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy