Reference for Nedarim 176:7

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> (במדבר ל, י) ונדר אלמנה וגרושה יקום עליה כיצד אמרה הריני נזירה לאחר שלשים יום אע"פ שנשאת בתוך ל' יום אינו יכול להפר

that since his object is to transfer it to others, she can acquire it from her husband. Rabina objected before R. Ashi: The following can acquire it on their behalf: his adult son or daughter, his Hebrew slave, male or female. But the following can not acquire it on their behalf: his son or daughter, if minors, his Canaanite slave, male or female, and his wife!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The reference is the same as above. This shews that the wife, having no powers of acquisition apart from her husband, cannot be the medium of transference, and thus contradicts the Mishnah just quoted. This difficulty arises in any case, but Rabina adduces it here to refute the distinction posited by Raba. ');">⁷</span> — But, said R. Ashi, the Mishnah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In 'Er. ');">⁸</span> holds good [only] when she possesses a court in that alley way,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.g., if she had inherited it before marriage, and the groom had written a deed renouncing all rights therein. ');">⁹</span> so that since she can acquire part ownership [in the 'erub] for herself,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because that is in the husband's own interest, for carrying is forbidden in the alley unless every resident — and the wife ranks as one in her own rights, since she possesses a court — is part owner of the 'erub, whereas the other teaching (a Baraitha) refers to the case where she has no court of her own. ');">¹⁰</span> she can also acquire it on behalf of others. <b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. BUT EVERY VOW OF A WIDOW AND OF HER THAT IS DIVORCED&nbsp;… SHALL STAND AGAINST HER.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Num. XXX, 10. ');">¹¹</span> HOW SO? IF SHE DECLARED, BEHOLD, I WILL BE A NAZIRITE AFTER THIRTY DAYS', EVEN IF SHE MARRIED WITHIN THE THIRTY DAYS, HE CANNOT ANNUL IT.

Jastrow

Jastrow