Reference for Niddah 47:53

א"ל

it is obvious, is it not, that it is viable?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If it had not been viable it could not have been permitted to be eaten. The permissibility to eat the creature, even after it was born, thus raises an objection against both Rab (who ruled that it was always forbidden) and against Samuel (who permitted it only when it was in its dam's bowels). V. Marginal Gloss. Cur. edd. in parenthesis add 'and this is a difficulty against Rab'. ');">⁴⁸</span>

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow