Reference for Pesachim 146:2
אלא אי אמרת לא בעי עקירה מרישא הוה ליה שלמים פסולו משום מאי משום דבר אחר דקא שחיט ליה אחר תמיד של בין הערבים עיבור צורה בעי
Then according to R, Hiyya b. Gamada, who said: It was thrown out from the mouth of the company and they said: [The circumstances are] e.g.. that its owners were unclean through a dead body and relegated to the second Passover: [thus] only this requires abrogation, but in general abrogation is not required, what can be said? - Rather, said R. Huna son of R. Joshua, what are we discussing here? E.g., if he separated it [for a Passover] before midday, and the owner died after midday, so that it was eligible and then rejected, and whatever was eligible and then rejected cannot be eligible again. - Is then our reasoning [required] for any but Rab, - surely Rab said: Live animals cannot be [permanently] rejected? Rather, said R. Papa, the author of this is R. Eliezer, who maintained: Similarly, if he slaughters other [sacrifices] for the sake of the Passover, they are unfit,] so that its disqualification is in itself. But if it is [according to] R. Eliezer, he would rule him liable to a sin-offering, since R. Eliezer rejects [the view that] he who errs in the matter of a precept is exempt! - R. Joseph the son of R. Salla the Pious explained it before R. Papa: The author of this is R. Joseph b. Honai. For we learned, R. Joseph b. Honai said: Those [other sacrifices] which are slaughtered for the purpose of a Passover or for the purpose of a sin-offering are unfit. This proves that its disqualification is in itself, and for that [reason] it must be burnt immediately; while in the matter of non-culpability he agrees with R. Joshua. <br>