Reference for Pesachim 44:9

ולהנך תנאי דמפקי ליה להאי קרא לדרשה אחרינא לחצי כופר ולדמי וולדות הנאת עורו מנא להו נפקא להו מאת בשרו את הטפל לבשרו

How is this implied? Simeon B'Zoma said: As a man may say to his friend, 'So-and-so has gone out clear from his property, and has no benefit whatsoever from it.' Thus the reason is that 'but the owner of the ox shall be clear' is written; for if [we deduced] from 'it shall not be eaten' [alone], that would imply a prohibition of eating, but not a prohibition of benefit?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. p. 100, n. 11.');">¹⁵</span>

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow