Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Shabbat 193:11

אמר רב יוסף הא מילתא איבעיא ליה לרב חסדא ופשטה ניהליה רב המנונא מהא מרה"י לרה"י ועובר ברשות הרבים עצמה ר' עקיבא מחייב וחכמים פוטרים מדקאמר ברשות הרבים עצמה פשיטא למטה מעשרה פליגי

R. Eleazar observed, It was a double miracle.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'a miracle within a miracle'. It first became a rod again, and as a rod it swallowed up their serpents. ');"><sup>20</sup></span> FROM ONE PRIVATE DOMAIN TO ANOTHER, etc. Rabbah asked: Do they disagree when it is below ten, and they differ in this: R. Akiba holds, An object caught up is at rest; while the Rabbis hold that it is not as at rest; but above ten all agree that he is not liable, for we do not learn throwing from reaching across. Or perhaps they disagree when it is above ten, and they differ in this: R. Akiba holds, We learn throwing from reaching across; while the Rabbis hold, We do not learn throwing from reaching across; but below ten, all agree that he is culpable. What is the reason? An object caught up is as at rest?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v, supra 4b for notes. ');"><sup>21</sup></span>

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Chizkuni

ויחר אף ה' בם, “and the anger of Hashem was kindled against them;” according to some commentators Aaron was also smitten with tzoraat;” (to account for the word: בם, “against them”) Another sage holds that G-d contented Himself with being angry at Aaron without taking any action against him. (Compare Talmud in tractate Shabbat folio 97)
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse