Reference for Shevuot 6:14

אלא האי סתמא אשכח שבועה שלא אוכל ככר זו שבועה שלא אוכלנה ואכלה

Granted that he who breaks the bone of an unclean paschal lamb does not receive lashes, because it is written: Ye shall not break a bone thereof<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XII, 46.');">⁹</span> - of a ritually clean and not of a disqualified paschal lamb. But he who leaves over a portion of a clean paschal lamb - why should he be exempt, unless it be because he is transgressing a negative precept not involving action, and a negative precept not involving action is not liable to punishment? [This, then, is the anonymous Mishnah with which R'Johanan agrees.] But how do you know that this Mishnah is reflecting the view of R'Jacob, who holds that the violation of a negative precept involving no action is not punishable by lashes? Perhaps it is reflecting the view of R'Judah [b. Ila'i], who holds that this transgressio is not punishable by lashes, because Scripture has come to appoint a positive precept to follow the negative precept,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., to provide a remedy for the violation of the negative precept, averting punishment.');">¹⁰</span> but otherwise it would be punishable by lashes. For it is taught: Ye shall let nothing remain until the morning; but that which remaineth of it until the morning ye shall burn with fire:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XII, 10.');">¹¹</span> Scripture has come to appoint the positive precept to follow the negative precept to teach us that this negative precept is not punishable by lashes, - this is the opinion of R'Judah. R'Jacob says, this is not the reason;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'not of the same denomination.'');">¹²</span> but rather because it is a negative precept not involving action, and the disregard of a negative precept not involving action is not punishable by lashes.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And since the exemption of the transgressor from lashes in the cited Mishnah may be due to R. Judah's reason and not R. Jacob's, the question remains, which is the anonymous Mishnah which supports R. Johanan?');">¹³</span> But he found the following anonymous Mishnah: 'I swear I shall not eat this loaf, I swear I shall not eat it;' and he ate it,

Jastrow