Reference for Yevamot 105:14
אמר לך ר"ל וליטעמיך סיפא דקתני בעל ועשה מאמר איצטריך לאשמועינן דאין קדושין תופסין באשת איש
provides support to the ruling of Samuel<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who stated, supra 27a, that if the levir had participated in the halizah with her whom he had divorced, her rival is not thereby exempt. Consequently, as was stated in our Mishnah, the halizah is to be performed by the second. ');"><sup>35</sup></span> and presents an objection against the ruling of R. Joseph?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 350, n, 6. ');"><sup>36</sup></span> — Does it state: He may participate in the <i>halizah</i>? What it states is 'had participated', implying a fait accompli.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 350, n. 7. ');"><sup>37</sup></span>