Reference for Yevamot 148:18

אמר רבא ולא

should apply to it!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the person who has not brought the prescribed sacrifice is still regarded as unclean. How then could the consumption of holy food be permitted to him? ');">⁵⁹</span> It must, therefore, be concluded that the text<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XII. 4. ');">⁶⁰</span> speaks of <i>terumah</i>. R. Shisha son of R. Idi demurred: How could it be said that the law of <i>terumah</i> was prescribed in this text?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XII. 4. ');">⁶⁰</span> Surely it was taught: [From the text]. Speak unto the children of Israel.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. 2. ');">⁶¹</span> one would only learn [that these laws<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Relating to uncleanness after childbirth. V. Lev. XII, 2ff. ');">⁶²</span> are applicable to] the children of Israel; whence, however, is one to infer that they also apply to a proselyte or an emancipated slave? Scripture consequently stated,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XII, 2. ');">⁶³</span> Woman.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Ker. 7b. ');">⁶⁴</span> Now, if it were to be assumed that the text speaks of <i>terumah</i>, are a proselyte and an emancipated slave, [it may be asked,] permitted to eat <i>terumah</i>!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Certainly not. The text must consequently refer not to terumah but to holy food! ');">⁶⁵</span> Said Raba: But does it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The text cited. ');">⁶⁶</span> not?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Speak of terumah? ');">⁶⁷</span>

Jastrow

Jastrow