Reference for Yevamot 65:9
בשלמא לבר קפרא כי אתנייה רבי לדידיה אליבא דר' שמעון כי אתנייה לרבי חייא אליבא דרבי יוסי אלא לרבי חייא בר קפרא שקורי קא משקר
According to [the statement of] Bar Kappara, however,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who asserts that Rabbi recognizes one offence only according to R. Jose. ');"><sup>32</sup></span> did R. Hiyya swear falsely?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If R. Jose allows the lighter punishment, how much more so R. Simeon. If R. Hiyya. then, made the statement that Rabbi taught him that a double offence had been committed he could not have spoken the truth since according to Bar Kappara no authority ever held such a view. ');"><sup>33</sup></span> -Rather, the question at issue between them<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Hiyya and Bar Kappara. ');"><sup>34</sup></span> is that of simultaneous prohibitions, and the view of R. Simeon<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Hiyya maintains that R. Simeon subjected the transgression to one offence only in the case of a 'comprehensive prohibition'; but that in a 'simultaneous prohibition' he admits, like R. Jose, a double offence. Bar Kappara, on the other hand, maintains that R. Simeon disagrees with R. Jose even in regard to simultaneous prohibitions, always admitting one offence only. ');"><sup>35</sup></span>