Reference for Yoma 121:18

אמר רבי יוחנן

R'Eleazar and R'Simeon hold: He starts again from the place he had stopped at. If he had completed the sprinklings due within [the Sanctuary] and the log was spilt, he shall bring another log and start again from the beginning with the application on the thumbs<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XIV, verse 17.');">¹⁶</span> and toes.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XIV, verse 17.');">¹⁶</span> If he had made some of the applications on the thumbs and toes and the log was spilt, he shall bring another log and start over again from the beginning with the applications on the thumbs and toes. R'Eleazar and R'Simeon hold: He shall start where he had stopped before. If he had completed the applications due on the thumbs and toes and the log was spilt, then all agree that the applications on the head are not a handicap.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence the dispute between the Rabbis did affect the log of oil as well.');">¹⁷</span> Say rather: R'Jacob taught me also [the difference of opinion] concerning the log.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The report had been originally misread. As R. Hananel suggests, it read: 'R. Jacob had not made any difference with regard to the log'. In its original interpretation it implied: There was no difference of opinion among the Rabbis touching the log. But, since that report was now refuted, the meaning must have been: R. Jacob taught me that there was no difference between the log and the other case; in both the Rabbis are of divergent opinion.');">¹⁸</span> The Master had said: The applications on the head are no handicap. Why that? Shall I say because Scripture says: And what remaineth over of the oil,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XIV, 29 which indicates that the oil used for the head is but a remainder and not an essential part of the rite.');">¹⁹</span> but then [when it says]: But that which is left of the meal-offering etc. ,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. II, 10.');">²⁰</span> would you say that there, too, it constitutes no handicap?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In reality it does, v. Men. 9a.');">²¹</span> - It is different there because it is written: 'And the rest'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. XIV, 17 with reference to the oil applied to the thumbs and toes.');">²²</span> and what remaineth over etc'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The oil applied on the thumbs and toes is thus designated 'remainder' and that applied on the head 'remainder of remainder' and therefore constitutes no handicap.');">²³</span>

Jastrow