Reference for Zevachim 114:8

מה להלן עד חצות אף כאן עד חצות

But on the view that it constitutes a hekkesh, what can be said?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The wave-loaves brought on Pentecost were made of a tenth of an ephah of flour, and they were leavened. Now, the thanksoffering was accompanied by four kinds of loaves; v. Lev. VII, 12-14. These included a set of leavened loaves (the other three kinds were unleavened) , but neither the actual number of each kind nor their weight is stated. By means of a gezerah shawah the Talmud deduces that there were the loaves of each kind, and from the superfluous 'ye shall bring' it infers that the leavened loaves were each to be made of a tenth of an ephah (these are those brought 'on another occasion') , just like the two wave-loaves, so that ten tenths were required for all. Thus the number is not deduced by a hekkesh but by a gezerah shawah, which is regarded as being explicitly stated in the subject itself, while the weight is learned by a hekkesh (the superfluous 'ye shall bring') . Then the Talmud infers by another hekkesh that the weight of the unleavened loaves is the same (v. preceding note) . The difficulty then is the same as the preceding on the number of sprinklings (v. p. 287, n. 3) .');">¹⁰</span> - 'Ye shall bring' is superfluous.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence the fact that the loaves of the thanks-offering require a tenth of an ephah each is not regarded as an inference by a hekkesh, but as though it were explicitly stated.');">¹¹</span>

Jastrow