Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Zevachim 208:18

פשיטא דלא שבקינן רובא דבהמה ואזלינן בתר רובא דאברים אלא שיצא חציו ברוב אבר האי מיעוטא דאבר

- Said R'Jeremiah B'Abba: His question is asked on the view that 'it is not time yet for them to be carried out' [is a disqualification].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 89b.');"><sup>17</sup></span> Do we say, that applies only to flesh which one is not eventually bound to carry out; but not to these, which must eventually be carried out; or perhaps here too [we argue that] it was not yet time for them to go out? - Come and hear, for Levi recited: 'which had become disqualified after they had gone out'. Does that not mean disqualification through going out? - No: it means disqualification through defilement or linah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Talmud means that when we ask about going out, we can argue that this may refer to linah, and vice versa.');"><sup>18</sup></span> R'Eleazar asked: What of the bullocks which were burnt and the goats which were burnt, if the greater part of them went out through the inclusion of the smaller part of a limb?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The greater part of the carcass was carried out, but it was the greater part only because it included the lesser part of a limb, the greater part of which was still within. Rashi: the question is whether that counts as going out, so that the men in front, who had carried that portion out (for the purpose of burning) defile their garments. Tosaf.: the question is whether (assuming that going out disqualifies) . this must now be burnt within (v. supra) .');"><sup>19</sup></span> Do we cast this lesser part of the limb after its greater part, and that indeed has not gone out;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence the lesser part itself is regarded as still within, and consequently the greater part of the carcass has not gone out.');"><sup>20</sup></span> or perhaps we cast it after the greater part of the animal? - It is obvious that we do not disregard the greater part of the animal and regard the greater part of the limb! Rather [the question arises] where half of it went out, through the inclusion of the greater part of the limb. Do we cast this lesser part of the limb<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which remained within.');"><sup>21</sup></span>

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull Chapter