Reference for Zevachim 214:4
להכי כתיב קרא למימר דלא אתא מבינייא
Rather, for that reason a text is written [to include sprinkling] to intimate that you may not infer from both combined.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Scripture thus intimates that this reasoning is not permissible in the present instance, Hence it is also not permissible in respect of taking the fistful or receiving, and so no text is required to show that these do not involve liability.');"><sup>4</sup></span> R'Abbahu said: If one slaughtered [a sacrifice] and sprinkled [its blood without]: according to R'Ishmael he is liable to one [sin-offering], [whereas] according to R'Akiba he is liable to two.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Ishmael infers liability for sprinkling from the phrase, 'blood shall be imputed'. Now, this is actually written in connection with slaughtering: thus we have a single interdict covering both, and the same kareth is written in connection with both. Hence when he commits both in one state of ignorance, they rank as one offence, and render him liable to one sin-offering only. R. Akiba, however, infers it from 'or a sacrifice', which is written in reference to offering-up. Hence slaughtering and sprinkling are separate interdicts and involve separate sin-offerings.');"><sup>5</sup></span>