Related%20passage for Eruvin 181:13

אלא אי אמרת בשלא עירבו היכי משכחת לה מאני דבתים בחצר הוא מותיב לה והוא מפרק לה בכומתא וסודרא

while the other may not!'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As a result, people might take the liberty of carrying the two kinds of objects into the next courtyard. Why then was no preventive measure enacted against such a possibility?');">³¹</span> - R'Simeon follows his own principle that in such cases no preventive measure need be enacted. For we learned: R'Simeon remarked: To what may this case be compared? To three courtyards that open one into the other and also into a public domain where, if the two outer ones made an 'erub with the middle one, It is permitted to have access to them and they are permitted access to it, but the two outer ones are forbidden access to one another'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 45b q.v. notes.');">³²</span> and no preventive measure against the possibility of carrying objects from the one courtyard into the other had been enacted; so also here no preventive measure has been enacted against the possibility of carrying objects from the houses of one courtyard into the next courtyard. R'Shesheth raised an objection: R'SIMEON RULED: ROOFS, COURTYARDS AND KARPAFS ARE EQUALLY REGARDED AS ONE DOMAIN IN RESPECT OF CARRYING FROM ONE INTO THE OTHER OBJECTS THAT WERE KEPT WITH THEM WHEN THE SABBATH BEGAN, BUT NOT IN RESPECT OF OBJECTS THAT WERE IN THE HOUSE WHEN THE SABBATH BEGAN. Now if you grant that the ruling<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Simeon's.');">³³</span> applies also to cases where an erub had been prepared it is quite easy to see how objects from a house call be found in a courtyard,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the limitation, 'BUT NOT IN RESPECT OF OBJECTS THAT WERE IN THE HOUSE' was consequently necessary.');">³⁴</span> but if you maintain that the ruling; applies only to cases where no 'erub had been prepared, how<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since in the absence of all 'erub no object may be carried from any of the houses into the courtyard.');">³⁵</span> is it possible for objects from a house to be found in a courtyard?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This being apparently impossible, what need was there for (cf. supra p. 631, n. 6) the limitation?');">³⁶</span> - He raised the objection and he also supplied the solution: [The objects] referred to might be skull-caps or turbans.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which may well have been in the house when the Sabbath began but were carried into the courtyard on one's head as articles of dress.');">³⁷</span>

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 181:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.