Related%20passage for Ketubot 112:10

תנא קמא נמי אין עושין קאמר אלא לאו הכי קאמר במה דברים אמורים בשלא קבל עליו אחריות אבל קבל עליו אחריות עושין ואתא רבי יוסי למימר כי קיבל עליו אחריות אמאי עושין והלא אין קצובין ופוחתין

Now, did not the first Tanna also say that [a ketubah] may not be made [a charge on movable property]? Rather this is what it means to say: This applies only where he accepted no responsibility; but where he accepted responsibility [the ketubah] may be made [a charge on movable property]. R. Yose then comes and says: Even If he did accept responsibility how [could the ketubah be] made [a charge on them] when their price is not fixed and they deteriorate in value.

Explore related%20passage for Ketubot 112:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.