Related%20passage for Pesachim 143:3

אלא פשיטא בטועה רישא בעוקר וסיפא בטועה א"ר אבין אין רישא בעוקר וסיפא בטועה

SAID R. ELIEZER TO HIM: LET THE PUBLIC SACRIFICES PROVE IT, WHICH ARE PERMITTED FOR THEIR OWN SAKE, YET HE WHO SLAUGHTERS [OTHER SACRIFICES] IN THEIR NAME IS CULPABLE. R. JOSHUA ANSWERED HIM: NOT SO: IF YOU SAY [THUS] OF PUBLIC SACRIFICES, [THAT IS] BECAUSE THEY HAVE A LIMIT; WILL YOU SAY [THE SAME] OF THE PASSOVER, WHICH HAS NO LIMIT? Are we to say that wherever there is a limit R. Joshua holds him culpable? Yet surely infants have a limit yet we learned: He who had two infants for circumcision, one for circumcision after the Sabbath and the other for circumcision on the Sabbath, and he erred and circumcised the one belonging to after the Sabbath on the Sabbath, he is culpable. [If he had] one for circumcision on the eve of the Sabbath and another for circumcision on the Sabbath, and he erred and circumcised the one belonging to the eve of the Sabbath on the Sabbath, - R. Eliezer holds him liable to a sin-offering. but R. Joshua exempts him, - Said R. Ammi: The circumstances here are e.g., that he first circumcised [the infant] of the eve of the Sabbath on the Sabbath, so that there is this [infant] of the Sabbath with whom he is pre-occupied; here e.g.. it means that he first slaughtered the public sacrifices at the beginning. <br>

Explore related%20passage for Pesachim 143:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.