Related for Nedarim 58:1
היינו דאיצטריך ליה לתנא למיתנא תרתי דסלקא דעתך אמינא קדושת הגוף לא פקעה בכדי קדושת דמים פקעה בכדי אמטו להכי תנא תרתי
hence the Tanna must teach both [clauses], because I would think that monetary consecration can automatically cease, but not so bodily sanctity; hence both are rightly taught. But if you maintain that the two refer to monetary consecration, why teach them both? If a higher sanctity can automatically give way to a lower sanctity, Surely it is superfluous to state that a lower sanctity can be replaced by a higher one?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The burnt-offering has a higher sanctity than a peace-offering. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Tosefta Kiddushin
[The process of something being transferred to the] ownership of the Temple with money, how so? If the treasurer gave coins for hekdesh moveable property, he acquires the hekdesh wherever he is; but a layperson [not empowered by the authority of the Temple] doesn't acquire until the moment he draws [it]. Speech [by a Temple treasurer or another official is as effective in transferring property] to the Temple as the handing over of a layperson. How so? "This ox is hekdesh", "This house is hekdesh"—even from where to the end of the world, he acquires the hekdesh wherever he is; but a layperson only acquires when he takes possession [of it].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy