אמרי לעולם בעל בסמוך קא מיפלגי וצריכא דאי איפליגו לענין חמץ הוה אמינא בההוא הוא דקאמר רבי יוחנן דלא בעינן על בסמוך משום דאיסור הוא וכל היכא דאיתיה איתיה
For if they differed on the subject of leaven [alone], I would say: It is only there that R'Johanan maintains that we do not require 'with' [in the sense of] near, because it is a prohibited article, and wherever it is, it is;but in the matter o sanctifying the bread,it is not sanctified save within [the Temple Court], [hence] I would assume [that] he agrees with R'Simeon B'Lakish, that if it is inside it is sanctified, and if not, it is not sanctified, by ana with service vessels.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' These sanctify whatever is put into them, but only when they are in the Temple Court (Tosaf.) .');"><sup>11</sup></span> Thus this [latter case] is necessary. And if we were informed [of this] in the matter of sanctifying the bread, I would say: in this R'Simeon B'Lakish maintains that we require 'with' [in the sense of] near, so that if it is inside it is sanctified, [and] if not, It is not sanctified.
Tosefta Pesachim
One who slaughters the Passover offering along with chametz on the fourteenth [of Nissan] transgresses a negative commandment, [but the] Passover offering itself is valid, and he fulfills his obligation through it with [respect to] the Passover offering. And whether he is the one who slaughters it, or the one who sprinkles its blood, or the one who offers it up [on the Altar, he is liable]. In what case does this apply? When one of the members of a collective [who will partake in the Paschal lamb] has chametz [in his possession]. If none of the members of the collective has chametz, he is exempt, but the one who pinches the neck of a bird inside [the Temple] with chametz on the fourteenth transgresses a negative commandment.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Tosefta Pesachim
One who slaughters the Passover offering along with chametz on the fourteenth [of Nissan] transgresses a negative commandment, [but the] Passover offering itself is valid, and he fulfills his obligation through it with [respect to] the Passover offering. And whether he is the one who slaughters it, or the one who sprinkles its blood, or the one who offers it up [on the Altar, he is liable]. In what case does this apply? When one of the members of a collective [who will partake in the Paschal lamb] has chametz [in his possession]. If none of the members of the collective has chametz, he is exempt, but the one who pinches the neck of a bird inside [the Temple] with chametz on the fourteenth transgresses a negative commandment.
