Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Related for Pesachim 178:16

אמר עולא ואיתימא ר' אושעיא אפשר ידעי חברין בבלאי טעמא דהאי מלתא זה הפריש טלה לפסחו וזה הפריש מעות לפסחו היאך הקדש חל על הקדש דקתני מעות שבידו חולין

has effected nothing,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The sacrifice must be offered on behalf of the first owner.');"><sup>22</sup></span> and the money, however much it is,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even if it exceeds the animal's worth.');"><sup>23</sup></span> is utilized<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'falls'.');"><sup>24</sup></span> for a freewill-offering. But since he has not effected anything, why should it be utilized for a freewill-offering?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' His action being null, the money remains hullin.');"><sup>25</sup></span> Said Raba: As a penalty.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He should not have bought another man's sacrifice.');"><sup>26</sup></span> And what does 'however much it is' mean? - Even if they [the animals] were only worth four [zuz] and he paid five, the Rabbis penalized him even in respect of that additional [zuz].' Ulla - others state, R'Oshaia - said: Perhaps our Babylonian colleagues know the reason for this ruling. [Consider:] one set aside a lamb for his Passover-offering, and another set aside money for his Passover-offering: how can sanctification fall upon sanctification, that he teaches, 'the money he holds is hullin.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Money consecrated for a sacrifice can revert to hullin only if an animal of hullin is bought therewith, whereby the animal receives the sanctity of the money, which in turn loses it and becomes hullin. Here, however, the money was consecrated and given for an animal (or part of it, which is the same) which was already consecrated for a Passover-offering: how then can additional sanctity fall upon the animal, in the sense that the sanctity of the money is transferred thereto, leaving the money hullin? - It cannot be answered that this refers to unconsecrated money, for in that case it is obvious.');"><sup>27</sup></span> ? -

Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse