Responsa for Eruvin 175:12
אמר רבה ומותבינן אשמעתין וכן שתי גזוזטראות זו למעלה מזו וכו' ואי אמרת יש דין גזל בשבת אמאי אסורות
a ruin reverts to its owner.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 12.');"><sup>24</sup></span> Said Rabbah: We raised an objection against this ruling of ours:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The one just discussed.');"><sup>26</sup></span> SO ALSO WHEN TWO BALCONIES WERE SITUATED IN POSITIONS ONE HIGHER THAN THE OTHER etc. Now, if it is maintained that 'the law [of the return] of a robbery is valid in respect of a Sabbath domain' why should restrictions be imposed?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Upon the tenants of the upper balcony, seeing that on the Sabbath, as in the case of the ruin just mentioned, it reverts to them alone despite its use by the tenants of the lower balcony during weekdays.');"><sup>27</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
SOURCES: Cr. 68; Pr. 31; L. 340; Rashba I, 850.
Teshuvot Maharam
SOURCES: Cr. 69; Pr. 31; L. 341; Rashba I, 850; Mord. Shabb. 375.
Teshuvot Maharam
SOURCES: Cr. 69; Pr. 31; L. 341; Rashba I, 850; Mord. Shabb. 375.