Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Eruvin 176:3

מאי בינייהו אמר אביי אריך וקטין איכא בינייהו

but in one that is less than four cubits they cannot be absorbed.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And, since the water inevitably flows into the public domain, his desire is fulfilled (cf. Supra n. 8 second clause) .');"><sup>6</sup></span> What is the practical difference between them?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Zera's and Rabbah's explanations.');"><sup>7</sup></span> - Abaye replied: The practical difference between them is a courtyard that was long and narrow.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Eight cubits by two, for instance. According to R. Zera's explanation it is permitted to pour water into it, since an area of 8 X 2 = 4 X 4, and the water would be absorbed in the courtyard itself before any of it reached the public domain. According to Rabbah, however, this is forbidden, since a narrow courtyard is an unsuitable place for spraying.');"><sup>8</sup></span>

Teshuvot Maharam

Q. On the Sabbath, may a Jew use latrines which are built in the city wall and open into a ditch surrounding the wall, so that the feces falling into the ditch are moved (by his force) from one Sabbath domain into another?
A. He should fasten a board beneath the seat (within not more than three tefahim below the latrine walls) so that the feces first fall on the board and then into the ditch. Should the board break on the Sabbath, he would still be permitted to use the latrine on that day.
SOURCES: Cr. 178, 179; Pr. 96; L. 349; Mord. Shabb. 376; Hag. Mord. Shabb. 461; Tashbetz 38; Hag. Maim., Shabbat 15, 4; Kol Bo 31 (p. 34a). Cf. Terumat Hadeshen 66.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse