Responsa for Eruvin 74:5
איפוך אימא ר' יוסי אומר לא חילל ומאי חזית דאפכת תרתי מקמי חדא איפוך חדא מקמי תרתי
- The last cited Baraitha was at all events<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'that certainly'.');"><sup>12</sup></span> taught in a reversed form; since In its final clause it was stated: R'Jose, howeve admits that where a man said: 'The [second] tithe which I have in my house shall be redeemed with the new sela'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It being the only one in his purse.');"><sup>13</sup></span> that would happen to come<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is discussed presently.');"><sup>14</sup></span> from my purse into my hand', the tithe is redeemed.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since there was only one new sela' there can be no doubt as to what particular coin the man had in mind.');"><sup>15</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
A. Since B has been prevented, by death, from fulfilling his promise, he never became obligated to pay the 20*In some sources (Pr. 50, L. 355) the reading is “marks.” The discrepancy arose because of the similarity of the two Hebrew letters of Khaf and Beth, which stand for 20 and 2 respectively. The Cremona source and the Mord., however, used the word Esrim, 20, specifically. marks to A. Consequently his heirs owe nothing to A.
This question was also sent to R. Meir by his father, R. Baruch, who was one of the judges in this case.
SOURCES: Cr. 31; Pr. 50; Pr. 939; L. 355; Mord. B.M. 247; cf. Jacob Weil, Responsa 105; ibid. 142.
Teshuvot Maharam
A. Since B has been prevented, by death, from fulfilling his promise, he never became obligated to pay the 20*In some sources (Pr. 50, L. 355) the reading is “marks.” The discrepancy arose because of the similarity of the two Hebrew letters of Khaf and Beth, which stand for 20 and 2 respectively. The Cremona source and the Mord., however, used the word Esrim, 20, specifically. marks to A. Consequently his heirs owe nothing to A.
This question was also sent to R. Meir by his father, R. Baruch, who was one of the judges in this case.
SOURCES: Cr. 31; Pr. 50; Pr. 939; L. 355; Mord. B.M. 247; cf. Jacob Weil, Responsa 105; ibid. 142.