Responsa for Ketubot 95:3

רבי יהודה אומר אפילו עני שבישראל וכו': מכלל דת"ק סבר הני לא היכי דמי אי דאורחה מ"ט דת"ק דאמר לא ואי דלאו אורחה מ"ט דר"י

Judah ruled: even the poorest man in Israel etc. This then implies that the first Tanna is of the opinion that these are not [necessary]. But how is one to imagine [the case]? If it was her customs, why would the first opinion say he is not liable? And if it is not her custom, then what is R. Judah’s reasoning?

Explore responsa for Ketubot 95:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.