Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Makkot 41:3

תני תנא קמיה דרבי יוחנן על מת בין ביד בין בכלי חייב על עבודת כוכבים ביד חייב בכלי פטור והא איפכא כתיב (מלכים א יח, כח) ויתגודדו כמשפטם בחרבות וברמחים אלא אימא ביד פטור בכלי חייב:

a Tanna who taught before Rabi Yochanan: [if one made an incision/gash] for the dead, whether it was by hand or by a tool, the person is culpable [for the punishment of lashes]. If the person did it for idolatry, by hand- the person is culpable, by a tool- the person is exempt (patoor) [from the punishment of lashes]. But isn't the opposite written (I Kings 18:28): "And they gashed themselves according to their practices, with knives and spears"? Rather, one should say: if it [the incision/gash] is done by hand, one is exempt [from the punishment] but if done with a tool one is culpable.

Shut min haShamayim

Regarding cutting sidelocks. Did the Torah forbid this even with the use of scissors? The Torah only says "Do not round off" (Leviticus 19:27), not 'do not destroy.' Is there any sense in the argument to permit this, based on the source in the Tosefta,1cf. Sifra Kedoshim 6:4, Makkot 21a:6 whereby the laws pertaining to haircutting are juxtaposed to the laws pertaining to beard-shaving, and in both cases, one is not liable unless a razor-blade is used2This argument is rejected by Tosafot on Shevuot 2b:12.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse