Responsa for Niddah 31:10
מדאמר הונא חברין משמיה דרב אשה שיש לה וסת והגיע שעת וסתה ולא בדקה ולבסוף ראתה חוששת לוסתה וחוששת לראייתה אלמא וסתות דאורייתא
Thus<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the possibility of a discharge at the time of the settled period is taken into consideration presumably even where no subsequent discharge had been observed. It is now assumed that 'discharge' was mentioned only on account of the second clause, 'the possibility … on account of her observation'. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
The blood stains on the shirt and sheets of a leprous woman do not render her impure. For these stains came from her leprous skin rather than from her womb. A stain on her shirt does not render her impure even during her "period", if she examined herself.
SOURCES: L. 185; Tashbetz 481; Orhot Hayyim II, p. 126.
SOURCES: L. 185; Tashbetz 481; Orhot Hayyim II, p. 126.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy