Responsa for Niddah 31:22
בוסתות גופייהו קמיפלגי דמ"ס וסתות דאורייתא ומר סבר וסתות דרבנן
maintaining that it is only Rabbinical?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. prev. n. but one mut. mut. But how could this be reconciled with the first version of R. Nahman supra according to which Rab is of the opinion that the examination is Pentateuchal? ');"><sup>21</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
The blood stains on the shirt and sheets of a leprous woman do not render her impure. For these stains came from her leprous skin rather than from her womb. A stain on her shirt does not render her impure even during her "period", if she examined herself.
SOURCES: L. 185; Tashbetz 481; Orhot Hayyim II, p. 126.
SOURCES: L. 185; Tashbetz 481; Orhot Hayyim II, p. 126.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy