Responsa for Niddah 34:19
תני רבי חייא
it is deemed unclean", but have we not learnt: BECAUSE IT IS PRESUMED TO HAVE COME FROM THE SOURCE?'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Emphasis on PRESUMED. If it is presumed to originate from the source (sc. the chamber) the uncleanness could not be described as a matter of 'doubt' but as one of certainty. ');"><sup>16</sup></span>
Maharach Or Zarua Responsa
2 - A woman has an abscess in her urinal canal which cannot be discerned. As a result, she experiences during urination, extreme pain in her thighs, which is followed by a discharge of blood. Even after urination, drops of blood are found in the vagina. She claims that she can discern the fact that the blood was discharged from the urinal canal by examining herself with cotton and testing for blood, and not from the Fallopian tubes. Does this blood render her ritually unclean?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy