Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Shabbat 266:12

מתקיף לה רב פפא אומן לימא להו אנא עבדי פלגא דמצוה אתון עבדיתו פלגא דמצוה אלא אמר רב פפא גדול

because it is said, [And thou shalt set upon the table shewbread] before me alway.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXV, 30. ');"><sup>22</sup></span> R. Jose said: Even if these remove and the other replace [it later], that too constitutes 'alway'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., 'alway' merely indicates that a night must not pass without shewbread lying upon the table. But the Rabbis hold that an interval would mark a new placing, not a continuation of the old, and so 'alway' would be unfulfilled. Similarly, when one withdraws from circumcision, to return for the shreds is a new act, hence not permitted unless these invalidate circumcision. ');"><sup>23</sup></span>

Binyan Tziyon

That which you have written, namely, that you treat as forbidden wine that has been touched by a Jew who publicly desecrates Shabbat as he is an apostate against the entire Torah, proving this assertion from Responsa Mabit as cited in Nekudot Ha-kesef on Yoreh De’ah (124:2), which forbids the drinking of wine touched by Karaites as they desecrate the festivals, which makes them tantamount to Shabbat desecrators—indeed, there is someone who disputes this, and you therefore ask me for my opinion in this matter.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse