Responsa for Shabbat 266:8
ממאי דילמא עד כאן לא קאמר ר' יוסי התם דלא ניתנה שבת לידחות אבל הכא דניתנה שבת לידחות הכי נמי
but here that the Sabbath was given to be superseded,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On account of the circumcision. ');"><sup>14</sup></span> it indeed is so?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That one must cut away all shreds. ');"><sup>15</sup></span>
Binyan Tziyon
That which you have written, namely, that you treat as forbidden wine that has been touched by a Jew who publicly desecrates Shabbat as he is an apostate against the entire Torah, proving this assertion from Responsa Mabit as cited in Nekudot Ha-kesef on Yoreh De’ah (124:2), which forbids the drinking of wine touched by Karaites as they desecrate the festivals, which makes them tantamount to Shabbat desecrators—indeed, there is someone who disputes this, and you therefore ask me for my opinion in this matter.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy