Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Taanit 31:7

למה יוצאין לבית הקברות פליגי בה ר' לוי בר חמא ור' חנינא חד אמר הרי אנו חשובין לפניך כמתים וחד אמר כדי שיבקשו עלינו מתים רחמים מאי בינייהו איכא בינייהו קברי עכו"ם

One says: [To signify thereby], We are merely like ashes before Thee; and the other says: That [God] may remember for our sake the ashes of Isaac.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This refers to the sacrifice of Isaac. Cf. Gen. XXII.');"><sup>6</sup></span> What is the difference between them? - The difference is with regard to [the use of] ordinary dust.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For humiliation ordinary dust or earth could be used, but for recalling the sacrifice of Isaac only ashes would do.');"><sup>7</sup></span>

Teshuvot Maharam

R. Jacob, the cantor of Magdeburg, died and left a son, Hizkiyahu, who was worthy to succeed his father as cantor of Magdeburg, though inferior to him in some qualities. A majority of the membership of the Magdeburg community wanted the son to succeed his father, but a minority of possibly one or more strongly objected to the son. R. Moses b. Hisdai was asked for his opinion in the matter. He advised Hizkiyahu to try any measure in his power to ingratiate himself with the objectors. He asked the leaders of the community to direct their efforts toward effecting a reconciliation with the opposing faction, and expressed his opinion that a single person could not defy the will of the entire community. R. Isaac b. Moses (of Vienna) stated that according to Biblical Law a community could not hire a cantor to whom there was objection even by a single person. R. Meir stated his opinion that a cantor might officiate throughout the year even though not acceptable to a few congregants, but that he was not permitted to officiate on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur or on fast days, if even a single congregant found him objectionable.
SOURCES: L. 109–11; Or Zarua I, 21a.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse