Responsa for Zevachim 192:5
והא לא תנא הכי א"ל מסתברא כבגד מה בגד אינו טעון כיבוס אלא מקום הדם אף כלי אינו טעון מריקה ושטיפה אלא במקום בישול
[Thereupon] he asked him: If one boiled [the sacrifice] in part of a vessel,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It was boiled with water, and so it could be boiled as it lay only in part of a vessel. Sh.M. explains that the other part of the vessel was not over the fire.');"><sup>8</sup></span> does it require scouring and rinsing, or does it not require [them]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the part in which the flesh was not boiled.');"><sup>9</sup></span> - It does not require them, he replied, by analogy with [the] spurting [of blood].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When the blood spurts on part of a garment, only that part must be washed.');"><sup>10</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
A. In France I witnessed a great controversy over this matter. But, at the time, I failed to inquire into the reasons of both those who permitted and those who forbade the use of the pot and its contents. I also discovered that Ri forbade the use of the pot and its contents, probably for the reason that the drop of milk first rendered the pot unfit for use, and the pot, in turn, rendered its contents unfit for use.
SOURCES: L. 121. Cf. Mord., Hulin, 679; P. 515; Hag. Maim., Maakalot Asurot 9, 3; Asher, Responsa 20, 26; Sefer Haparnes 19.
Teshuvot Maharam
A. Rabbenu Samson permits its use while Ri forbids it. Ri bases his opinion on the fact that a drop of milk does not spread over the whole pot, and since the part of the pot affected is not sixty times the volume of the milk, the milk is not neutralized. Therefore, even according to Ri if one could gage the volume of the milk and find a ratio of one to sixty to the volume of the part of the pot affected, the milk would be neutralized. In any event, if the loss be an appreciable one, or the enjoyment of the Sabbath or a holiday be involved, one may be lenient, in view of R. Samson's opinion.
SOURCES: P. 515; Mord., Hulin, 679; cf. L. 121; Asher, Responsa 20, 26; Sefer Haparnes 19.