Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Talmud for Menachot 41:9

לא קשיא כאן שהקפה באור כאן שהקפה בחמה באור לא הדר בחמה הדר

sin-offerings,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The blood of these sin-offerings, even though hardened in the sun, is still fit for its ritual purpose, and it still retains its character as blood. Likewise the blood of non-consecrated animals when hardened by the sun is also counted as blood, and therefore whosoever eats thereof commits a transgression.');"><sup>15</sup></span> and the other<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ze'iri's case.');"><sup>16</sup></span> with [the blood of] internal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., sin-offerings whose blood must be sprinkled upon the veil and upon the golden altar, e.g., the bullocks and the he-goats which were to be wholly burnt, v. Lev. IV, ff.');"><sup>17</sup></span>

Jerusalem Talmud Maaser Sheni

HALAKHAH: 7This and the following paragraphs (up to Note 35) are also in Yoma 8:3 (fol. 45a), Ševu‘ot 3:2 (fol. 34b). The parallel discussion in the Babli is Ševu‘ot 22b–23a.“Second Tithe is to be used for eating,” etc. It is to be used for eating, since eating is written regarding it8Deut. 14:23.. For drinking, since drinking is included in eating. From where that drinking is included in eating? Rebbi Jonah understood if from the following (Lev. 17:12): “Therefore, I said to the Children of Israel, no person among you may eat blood.” Where do we hold? If about congealed blood, did we not state9Tosephta Tahorot 2:5.: “Congealed blood is neither food nor drink”? So we must hold as is10Fluid blood., and the Torah called it “eating.” But did we not state11Babli Ḥulin 120a, Menaḥot 21a.: “If he mashed the fat12The fat of domestic animals which from sacrifices is burned on the altar and from profane meat is forbidden as food. and sipped it, congealed the blood and ate it, he is guilty!” How does Rebbi Jonah explain? It is neither food, to accept the impurity of food, nor drink, to accept the impurity of drinks13The Tosephta Tahorot adds explicitly: “If he thought of [the congealed blood] as food, it accepts the impurities of food.” The argument of R. Jonah is not acceptable..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse