Talmud for Menachot 80:13
מאי טלית פטורה אילימא דלית בה שיעורא והתניא טלית שהקטן מתכסה בו ראשו ורובו
Perhaps it was to cancel the others, so that there was no transgression of 'Thou shalt not add thereto'; accordingly the act done is considered an act.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Nevertheless R. Zera rules that the second set of fringes is valid even though it was ready made; thus in conflict with the principle laid down.');"><sup>18</sup></span> R'Zera said in the name of R'Mattena who said it in the name of Samuel, [A garment that is provided with] fringes does not come within the prohibition of diverse kinds,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And it may be worn by a person that is not subject to the law of zizith, e.g. a woman (R. Tam) .');"><sup>19</sup></span> and [it is the same] even though the garment was exempt from zizith. What is meant by 'a garment exempt from zizith'? Does it mean a garment smaller than the prescribed measure? But it has been taught: A garment with which a child can cover his head and most of his body,