את המת במטה חייב וכן כזית מן המת וכו': אמר רבה בב"ח א"ר יוחנן וא"ר יוסף אמר רשב"ל פוטר היה ר"ש
yet R. Johanan said, Ben Bathyra and R. Nathan said the same thing?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., Ben Bathyra permits the sale of a horse even to a Persian, showing that even a bound person is not a burden.
');"><sup>13</sup></span> There they suffer from haughtiness,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Their haughty bearing makes them look as if they cannot walk, but actually they are able to quite well.
');"><sup>14</sup></span> for a certain officer with whom the king was angry ran three parasangs on foot. A CORPSE IN A BED, HE IS CULPABLE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Tosaf. identifies R. Judah as the authority for this ruling, he being of the opinion that there is liability for a labour not essential in itself cf. supra p. 448, n. 8.] ');"><sup>15</sup></span> AND LIKEWISE [IF ONE CARRIES OUT] THE SIZE OF AN OLIVE OR A CORPSE, etc. Rabbah b. Bar Hanah said in R. Johanan's name, and R. Joseph said in the name of Resh Lakish: R. Simeon declared exempt
Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim
“Ben Bathyra permits horses.” Rebbi Jehudah said this only about a male horse because it kills [its owner] in war. Some say, because it runs after a female, and some say, because it stands still to urinate. What is between them? A gelding. He who says because it runs after a female, [this one] does not run after a female. He who says because it stands still to urinate, this one also stands still to urinate. Rebbi Aḥa in the name of Rebbi Tanḥum bar Ḥiyya: If it gets old he binds it to the grindstone. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun in the name of Rebbi Ḥuna: Ben Bathyra and Rebbi Nathan both said the same, as it was stated: “If he carried domestic animals, wild animals, or birds, whether alive or dead, he is liable. Rebbi Nathan says, dead he is liable, alive he is not liable.” The rabbis hold that he is liable for a purification sacrifice and they answer him so? They answer following his own argument. Following your argument, since you are saying because of rabbinic Sabbath prohibition, also we hold that if it gets old he binds it to the grindstone. Rebbi says, I am saying that it is forbidden for two reasons, as a weapon and as a large animal. It was stated so: A large wild animal is like a large domestic animal. Who stated this? Rebbi. The words of the Sages: Rebbi Bisna, Ḥanin bar Abba in the name of Rav: A wild animal is like a small domestic animal.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy