חדא מינייהו בטולי מבטיל קמ"ל אמר רב יוסף אמר רב יהודה אמר שמואל הלכה כרבי אליעזר בן יעקב א"ל אביי הלכה מכלל דפליגי אמר ליה מאי נפקא לך מינה אמר ליה גמרא גמור זמורתא תהא:
He [the owner] may completely disregard one;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He will untie only the lower one, and the animal can leave the stable by stooping.
');"><sup>1</sup></span> hence he [the Tanna] informs us (that we do not fear this]. R. Joseph said in Rab Judah's name in Samuel's name: The <i>halachah</i> is as R. Eliezer b. Jacob. Said Abaye to him, [You say,] The <i>halachah</i> [etc.]: hence it follows that they [the Rabbis] disagree?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Surely not, seeing that this is exactly similar to the other cases.
');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat
HALAKHAH: Mishnah. “A donkey may go out with its saddle cloth,” etc. Samuel said, if it was tied to it from before the Sabbath. Ḥanin from Gophtia said before Samuel, Rav Ḥiyya bar Ashi does not act like this. He told him, Rav uses kleisterin, as it was stated: rams go out with kleisterin. Rebbi Aḥa bar Papa objected before Rebbi Zeˋira: But was it not stated: a rope tied to a cow may be tied to the feeding trough, the feeding trough may be tied to a cow. One understands a cow’s may be tied to the feeding trough. May from the feeding trough be tied to a cow? Would he not use the animal’s sides on the Sabbath? Rebbi Abba said, explain it for knots which are not permanent. Rebbi Yose said, is there a difference for sides of an animal whether the knot is permanent or not permanent? Rebbi Shammai said, explain it following Rebbi Simeon ben Eleazar, as it was stated, Rebbi Simeon ben Eleazar said, it is permitted to use the sides of an animal on the Sabbath. There is no difference between sides of an animal and sides of a tree. Rebbi Mana said, I confirmed it if he connects rope to rope.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy