Talmud for Yevamot 41:7
גבי עריות נמי הא כתיב אלה ההוא למעוטי מדות מכרת
but in the former Eleh.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [H] Deut. XXV, 16. This implies that the sin of incest is of a milder nature. ');"><sup>16</sup></span> — El implies rigour, but Eleh implies greater rigour than El.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' El and Eleh have the same meaning, but the additional eh ([H]) at the end of the latter is taken to imply additional punishment. ');"><sup>17</sup></span> Is not Eleh written also In connection with forbidden relatives?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XVIII, 26. [H] ');"><sup>18</sup></span>
Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot
How can one prove secondary prohibitions? Rebbi Ḥuna said: “These86Lev. 18:27, כִּי אֶת־כָּל־הַתּוֹעֵבוֹת הָאֵל “all these abominations”, these should have been written הָאֵלֶּה; the short form is taken as a hint of the root אל “power” (the meaning of the word commonly but wrongly translated as “God”).”, the strong ones. This implies that there are weaker ones87In the Babli, 21a, the argument is in the name of Rava.. The following are the secondary prohibitions88Babli 21a, Tosephta 3:1 (parallels the Babli in content and the Yerushalmi in language), Derekh Ereṣ Rabba 1, extended to contain most of the next paragraph.: His paternal grandmother and his maternal grandmother, his paternal grandfather’s wife and his maternal grandfathers wife, his grandson’s wife whether from son or daughter, the wife of his mother’s brother and the wife of his father’s maternal brother.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy