Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Tosefta for Zevachim 188:7

הכיבוס במקום קדוש כו': מנא הני מילי דת"ר (ויקרא ו, כ) תכבס במקום קדוש שבירת כלי חרס מניין ת"ל (ויקרא ו, כא) וכלי חרס אשר תבושל בו ישבר מריקה ושטיפה בכלי נחשת מנין ת"ל (ויקרא ו, כא) ואם בכלי נחשת בושלה ומורק ושוטף במים:

Thus, only dabbing [is permitted], but not washing? Subsequently Raba appointed an interpreter before him and lectured:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Rabbis gave their public lectures through interpreters (amora) .');"><sup>8</sup></span> What I told you was an error; but in truth, dabbing is permitted but washing is forbidden.

Tosefta Chullin

An animal that died, and he tore her open and found inside her a living nine-month old fetus, [that fetus] requires [ritual] slaughter, and he is liable in the [priestly] gifts, but it is disqualified from being placed on the altar (*because it is a ben pekuah). [*Note: This phrase omitted in MS Vienna.] One who slaughters a tereifah and found in it a live nine-month old fetus, it requires slaughter and is liable in the [priestly] gifts, and if it is dead it is pure from the impurity of carrying because the slaughter of its mother purified it. One who slaughters a sin-offering and found inside her a live four-month old fetus, even after three days (see Minchat Yitzchak), and even if it went "outside the curtains" (i.e., outside the Temple courtyard, see Zev. 94b:13), it is is permitted to eat. If an animal in its first pregnancy miscarried the amniotic sac, it should be thrown to the dogs, but if [the fetus] had been consecrated, [the amniotic sac belonging to the miscarried fetus] must be buried, because its growth was consecrated. The amniotic sac does not disqualify [an otherwise valid] sacrifice, whether [it is eaten] outside the designated time or outside the designated area, nor can the thoughts [of the priest] render it disqualified, and one who offers it [for sacrifice] outside the Temple courtyard is exempt.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse